This is a mishy-mashy jungle fire blog. There's lots of The Untamed right now, gaming jokes, Sailor Moon, feminism, politics and... idek fandom stuff. I am Page, (or sometimes Momo). I live in New Zealand and I write a lot; play a lot of video games and don't see why hanging out with people is more valid than hanging out with my cat. You are welcome to talk to me I am very awkward but like people on the internet.

probablyasocialecologist:

The study itself is titled, “Long-Term Regret and Satisfaction With Decision Following Gender-Affirming Mastectomy,” and sought to study the rate of regret and satisfaction after 2 years or more following gender affirming top surgery. The study’s results were stunning - in 139 surgery patients, the median regret score was 0/100 and the median satisfaction score was 5/5 with similar means as well. In other words… regret was virtually nonexistent in the study among post-op transgender people.

In fact, the regret was so low that many statistical techniques would not even work due to the uniformity of the numbers:

In this cross-sectional survey study of participants who underwent gender-affirming mastectomy 2.0 to 23.6 years ago, respondents had a high level of satisfaction with their decision and low rates of decisional regret. The median Satisfaction With Decision score was 5 on a 5-point scale, and the median decisional regret score was 0 on a 100-point scale. This extremely low level of regret and dissatisfaction and lack of variance in scores impeded the ability to determine meaningful associations among these results, clinical outcomes, and demographic information.

The numbers are in line with many other studies on satisfaction among transgender people. Detransition rates, for instance, have been pegged at somewhere between 1-3%, with transgender youth seeing very low detransition rates. Surgery regret is in line with at least 27 other studies that show a pooled regret rate of around 1% - compare this to regret rates from things like knee surgery, which can be as high as 30%. Gender affirming care appears to be extremely well tolerated with very low instances of regret when compared to other medically necessary care.

[…]

The intense conservative backlash, to the point of disputing reputable scientific journals, likely stems from the fact that reduced regret rates weaken a central narrative these figures have championed in legal and legislative spaces. Over the past three years, anti-trans entities have showcased political detransitioners, reminiscent of the ex-gay campaigns from the 1990s and 2000s, to argue that regrets over gender transition and detransition are widespread. Some have even asserted detransition rates of up to 80%, a claim that has been broadly debunked. Yet, research consistently struggles to find substantial evidence supporting this narrative. The rarity of detransition and regret is underscored by Florida's inability to enlist a single resident to bear witness against a lawsuit challenging the state’s ban on gender-affirming care.

void-star:

Love bombing is not a euphemism for “too much affection too soon,” or “high desire for contact.”

“Love bombing” is a term originally used in the context of cults to describe a deliberate and coordinated recruitment method that involved feigning friendship and interest in a potential recruit, via flattery, flirtation, physical affection, and very directed positive attention to everything the recruit says in order to lure them into the cult.

Since cults and abusive relationships operate in similar ways and use similar tactics, love bombing in an interpersonal relationship looks like manufacturing closeness in order to trap someone into a relationship in which the abuser has all the control.

And I know these days there’s a million bullshit junky articles out there that make you think this is a symptom of cluster b personality disorders, but there is no way for you to be love bombing somebody without realizing it.

If you are an affectionate person and the level of affection and attention you give makes someone uncomfortable, you are not “accidentally” abusing them.

If you are uncomfortable with the level of affection and attention someone is paying you, they are not de facto abusing you.

Love bombing is about using someone’s desire for human connection to fast track them into a situation you control that they will feel disinclined to leave.

sasharjones:

eisly:

I’ve been looking for this really helpful post about artist growth… where you get to these points where your skill doesn’t match your knowledge of what SHOULD look good, and then it flips… it looked like a double helix on the graph, if that helps. If anyone happens to have that pic I’d love to see it again!

image

Here you go!

There’s also this one, I just prefer the one above because it’s easier for my brain to parse.

image

maculategiraffe:

we got this at a yard sale and I desperately want to know what is going on in it. from googling it seems likely to be a depiction of eleventh century chinese recluse poet Lin Pu (or Bu) who really liked plum blossoms and cranes. but can anyone tell me what the text says, if anything? google lens is being no help at all, it’s like “please take a picture of the text you want to translate”

image
image
image
image

soul-hammer:

smugpuffin:

wumblr:

etakeh:

Tweet from NoBonzo @NoBonzo Very important info for portland area graffiti writers who use social media.   Two writers who were just arrested were identified because police subpoenaed one of their instagrams and meta happily complied. 9:40 PM · Apr 27, 2023ALT

I’m sure tumblr would never, but hey. No sense tempting fate.

they do

Social media is not private, emails are not private, internet searches are not private, your text messages are not private.

“I use a VPN!” Your ISP can see when you initially connect to a VPN. The VPN company will comply with a subpoena.

“My socials don’t have my real name!” What about the email to register that social? What about your wifi provider? They provide the IP address from which you’re frequently logging in. Don’t they have your information?

Your cell carrier will comply with a subpoena.

You ISP will comply with a subpoena.

So will Google, Apple, Yahoo, Meta, Tumblr, Twitter, you name it. None of them will fight the government on behalf of a random person they don’t care about.

This is why fighting for online privacy laws, real actual privacy laws, is so important. It’s why using services with end-to-end encryption is so important. It’s why if you don’t want any chance of law enforcement to know about something, you cannot post about it online in any way.

The messages we recieved growing up about being very careful about what you post online wasn’t fear mongering. They just picked a different villain.

Also make sure your VPN isn’t based in one of the 14 Eyes countries

resumbrarum:
“the-haiku-bot:
“angieartness:
“ brunhiddensmusings:
“ cameoamalthea:
“ brunhiddensmusings:
“ threeraccoonsinatrenchcoat:
“ badgerofshambles:
“a singular scuit. just one.
”
an edible cracker with just one side. mathematically impossible...

resumbrarum:

the-haiku-bot:

angieartness:

brunhiddensmusings:

cameoamalthea:

brunhiddensmusings:

threeraccoonsinatrenchcoat:

badgerofshambles:

a singular scuit. just one. 

an edible cracker with just one side. mathematically impossible and yet here I am monching on it.

‘scuit’ comes from the french word for ‘bake’, ‘cuire’ as bastardized by adoption by the brittish and a few hundred years

‘biscuit’ meant ‘twice-baked’, originally meaning items like hardtack which were double baked to dry them as a preservative measure long before things like sugar and butter were introduced. if you see a historical doccument use the word ‘biscuit’ do not be fooled to think ‘being a pirate mustve been pretty cool, they ate nothing but cookies’ - they were made of misery to last long enough to be used in museum displays or as paving stones

image

‘triscuit’ is toasted after the normal biscuit process, thrice baked

thus the monoscuit is a cookie thats soft and chewy because it was only baked once, not twice

image

behold the monoscuit/scuit

Why is this called a biscuit:

image

when brittish colonists settled in the americas they no longer had to preserve biscuits for storage or sea voyages so instead baked them once and left them soft, often with buttermilk or whey to convert cheap staples/byproducts into filling items to bulk out the meal to make a small amount of greasy meat feed a whole family. considering hardtack biscuits were typically eaten by dipping them in grease or gravy untill they became soft enough to eat without breaking a tooth this was a pretty short leap of ‘just dont make them rock hard if im not baking for the army’ but didnt drop the name because its been used for centuries and people forgot its french for ‘twice baked’ back in the tudor era, biscuit was just a lump of cooked dough that wasnt leavened bread as far as they cared

thus the buttermilk biscuit and the hardtack biscuit existed at the same time. ‘cookies’ then came to america via german and dutch immigrants as tiny cakes made with butter, sugar/molasses, and eggs before ‘tea biscuits’ as england knew them due to the new availability of cheap sugar- which is why ‘biscuit’ and ‘cookie’ are separate items in america but the same item in the UK

the evolution of the biscuit has forks on its family tree

😳 I never knew I needed this information. But i NEEDED IT

😳 I never knew I

needed this information.

But i NEEDED IT

Beep boop! I look for accidental haiku posts. Sometimes I mess up.

I feel I should offer a couple notes:

  1. The French comes from Latin biscoctus, bis- “twice” + coctus “cooked”, which is why it’s got the weird ‘s’ in there. In Old French it was bescuit, and it actually shifted forms a couple times in English before landing more or less where it had come from.
  2. As a result of its Latin heritage, “biscuit” has relatives in other Romance languages, notably Italian biscotti and Spanish bizcocho.

I’m still stuck back on op unintentionally suggesting we could pronounce biscuit like we pronounce bisexual. Bi-scuit. I want to do this around other people and watch them feel uncomfortable.